Removed tags. Removed gradual from related.

related.tex

@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ are several distinct instances of the same polymorphic type.
 }%%%rev
 
 
-\rev{TODO refinement + gradual ?}
+%\rev{TODO refinement + gradual ?}
 
 \citet{Kent16} bridge the gap between prior work on occurrence typing
 and SMT-based (sub-)typing. They introduce the $\lambda_{RTR}$ core calculus, an

scp-reviews-2108.tex

@@ -687,8 +687,6 @@ the new contributions.
   {[}5{]} studies the integration of liquid with gradual types while
   preserving the gradual guarantees.
   \begin{answer}
-    Victor
-
     The reviewer forgot to include the reference [5] in the report but
     we are pretty sure that [5] must refer to ``Gradual Liquid Type
     Inference'' (OOPSLA 2018). We were aware of this work, of course,
@@ -1069,8 +1067,6 @@ languages, how would you describe the relationship between occurrence
 typing and `smart casts' in Kotlin, resp. type promotion in Dart? Those
 languages use a mostly sound static type system, and smart-casts / type-promotion play a big role in practice.
 \begin{answer}
-  ANYBODY? Victor?!!!
-
   Kotlin and Dart is ground zero occurrence typing that does not require any
   formal development. It is less expressive than a small hack that we
   implemented in CDuce (which works not only when the tested