### I need to change the orientation of the canonical comparison map, which is the...

I need to change the orientation of the canonical comparison map, which is the wrong way. Moreover, I reaally need to write down Proposition 4.5.6, the most important technical result of the dissertation.
parent 8955f803
 ... ... @@ -299,19 +299,19 @@ In particular, this means that we have a morphism of localizers $\kappa : (\Psh{ Beware that neither$c_{\oo} : \Psh{\Delta} \to \oo\Cat$nor$\lambda : \oo\Cat \to \Ch$preserve weak equivalences \todo{Uniformiser appellations}, but this doesn't contradict the fact that$\lambda c_{\oo} : \Psh{\Delta} \to \Ch$does. \end{remark} \section{Polygraphic homology vs. true'' homology} \begin{paragr} Recall from Paragraph \ref{paragr:compweakeq} that the identity functor on$\oo\Cat$induces a morphism of localizer$(\oo\Cat,\W^{\folk}) \to (\oo\Cat,\W^{Th})$. Hence, we have a triangle of functors $\begin{paragr}\label{paragr:cmparisonmap} Recall from Paragraph \ref{paragr:compweakeq} that the identity functor on \oo\Cat induces a morphism of localizers (\oo\Cat,\W^{\folk}) \to (\oo\Cat,\W^{\Th}), and hence a functor \J : \ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk} \to \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}). Together with the polygraphic and true'' homology functors, this yields a triangle of functors \begin{equation}\label{cmprisontrngle} \begin{tikzcd} \ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \ar[r] \ar[rd,"\sH^{\pol}"'] & \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[d,"\sH"] \\ \ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \ar[r,"\J"] \ar[rd,"\sH^{\pol}"'] & \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[d,"\sH"] \\ & \ho(\Ch). \end{tikzcd}$ \end{equation} As we shall see later, this triangle is \emph{not} commutative, even up to an iso. However, it can be filled up with a natural transformation. Indeed, consider the following$2$-diagram $\begin{tikzcd} \oo\Cat \ar[r,"\mathrm{id}_{\oo\Cat}"]\ar[d] & \oo\Cat \ar[d] \ar[r,"\lambda"] & \Ch \ar[d] \\ \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[r] &\ho(\oo\Cat^{can}) \ar[r,"\sH^{\pol}"] & \ho(\Ch), \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[r] &\ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \ar[r,"\sH^{\pol}"] & \ho(\Ch), \ar[from=2-2,to=1-3,"\alpha^{\folk}",Rightarrow] \end{tikzcd}$ ... ... @@ -325,35 +325,44 @@ In particular, this means that we have a morphism of localizers$\kappa : (\Psh{ $\begin{tikzcd} \ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \ar[r] \ar[rd,"\sH^{\pol}"',""{name=A,above}] & \ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[d,"\sH"] \\ & \ho(\Ch)\ar[from=A,to=1-2,"\beta",Rightarrow] & \ho(\Ch)\ar[from=A,to=1-2,"\pi",Rightarrow] \end{tikzcd}$ such that \todo{mettre diagrammes.} For any $\oo$\nbd-category $X$, we shall refer to the map $\beta_X : \sH^{\pol}(X) \to \sH(X) \pi_X : \sH^{\pol}(X) \to \sH(X)$ as the \emph{canonical comparison map.} \end{paragr} \begin{paragr} This motivates the following definition. \begin{definition} An $\oo$\nbd-category $X$ is said to be \emph{\good} when the canonical comparison map $\pi_X : \sH^{\pol}(X) \to \sH(X)$ is an isomorphism of $\ho(\Ch)$. \end{definition} \iffalse \begin{paragr} We can now finally properly state the question that was tried to be answered in this doctoral dissertation: \begin{center} For which $\oo$-categories $X$ is the canonical comparison map $\beta_X : \sH^{\pol}(X) \to \sH(X) \pi_X : \sH^{\pol}(X) \to \sH(X)$ an isomorphism ? \end{center} The rest of this document is devoted to (partially) answering this question. We start by giving in the next paragraph an example due to Ara and Maltsiniotis of an $\oo$-category for which the comparison map is \emph{not} an isomorphism. \end{paragr} \begin{paragr} Let $B$ the commutative monoid $(\mathbb{N},+)$ considered as $2$-category.\footnote{The letter $B$ stands for bubble''.} That is, \end{paragr}\fi We begin by spelling out an example due to Ara and Maltsiniotis of an $\oo$-category which is \emph{not} \good. Examples of \good $\oo$-categories will be presented later. The rest of this dissertation is devoted to the study of \good $\oo$\nbd-categories. \begin{paragr} Let $B$ the commutative monoid $(\mathbb{N},+)$ considered as $2$-category.\footnote{The letter $B$ stands for bubble''.} That is, $B_k=\begin{cases}\{\star\} \text{ if } k=0,1 \\ \mathbb{N} \text{ if } k=2.\end{cases} B_k=\begin{cases}\{\star\} \text{ if } k=0,1 \\ \mathbb{N} \text{ if } k=2,\end{cases}$ and the two compositions laws on the set of $2$-cells coincide and are given by integral addition. Note that we have already encountered this contruction in the proof of Lemma \ref{lemma:abelpol}. % as a unique $0$-cell, no non trivial $1$-cell, the set of non-negative integers $\mathbb{N}$ as the set of $2$-cells and the two composition laws on $2$-cells coincide and are given by the addition. All axioms of $2$-categories are trivial except maybe for the exchange law, which follows from the commutativity of the integral addition. \todo{Faire le lien avec la preuve lemme abelpol?} This $2$-category is free in the sense of \todo{ref}, namely it has a unique generating $0$-cell, no generating $1$-cell and the integer $1$ as the unique generating $2$-cell. It follows from Lemma \ref{lemma:abelpol} that $\sH^{\pol}(B)$ is given by the following chain complex (seen as an object of $\ho(\Ch)$): This $2$-category is free in the sense of \todo{ref}, namely it has a unique generating $0$\nbd-cell, no generating $1$\nbd-cell and the integer $1$ as the unique generating $2$\nbd-cell. It follows from Lemma \ref{lemma:abelpol} that $\sH^{\pol}(B)$ is given by the following chain complex (seen as an object of $\ho(\Ch)$): $\begin{tikzcd}[column sep=small] \mathbb{Z} & 0 \ar[l] & \ar[l] \mathbb{Z} & \ar[l] 0 & \ar[l] 0 & \ar[l] \cdots ... ... @@ -363,5 +372,32 @@ In particular, this means that we have a morphism of localizers \kappa : (\Psh{ \[ \sH^{\pol}_k(B)=\begin{cases} \mathbb{Z} \text{ if } k=0,2\\ 0 \text{ in other cases.}\end{cases}$ On the other hand, it was proven in \cite[Theorem 4.9 and Example 4.10]{ara2019quillen} that (the nerve of) $B$ is a $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$-space. In particular, it has non-trivial homology groups in every even dimension. On the other hand, it was proven in \cite[Theorem 4.9 and Example 4.10]{ara2019quillen} that (the nerve of) $B$ is a $K(\mathbb{Z},2)$-space. In particular, it has non-trivial homology groups in every even dimension. This proves that $B$ is \emph{not} \good. \end{paragr} \iffalse\begin{remark} The previous example of non \good $\oo$-category also proves that triangle \ref{cmprisontrngle} cannot be commutative up to an iso. \end{remark}\fi We shall now proceed to give an abstract criterion to find \good $\oo$-categories. In the rest of this dissertation, we will exploit this criterion to exhibit the largest classes possible of \good $\oo$-categories. \begin{paragr} Both the polygraphic homology $\sH^{\pol} : \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \to \Ho(\Ch)$ and the true'' homology $\sH : \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \to \Ho(\Ch)$ are homotopy cocontinous (Definition \ref{def:cocontinuous}). In the first case, this follows from Theorem \ref{thm:cisinskiII} and the fact that $\lambda : \oo\Cat \to \Ch$ is left Quillen with respect to the canonical model structure on $\oo\Cat$. In the second case, this follows from the fact that $\overline{N_{\oo}} : \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th} \to \Ho(\Ch)$ induces an equivalence of op-prederivators and that $\kappa : \Psh{\Delta} \to \Ch$ is left Quillen. Besides, the construction of the canonical comparison map from Paragraph \ref{paragr:cmparisonmap} can be reproduced \emph{mutatis mutandis} in the $2$\nbd-category of op-prederivators, yielding a $2$-morphism of op-prederivators $\begin{tikzcd} \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \ar[r,"\J"] \ar[rd,"\sH^{\pol}"',""{name=A,above}] & \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}) \ar[d,"\sH"] \\ & \Ho(\Ch).\ar[from=A,to=1-2,"\pi",Rightarrow] \end{tikzcd}$ We will see later that the top arrow of the previous diagram, which is induced by the identity functor on $\oo\Cat$, cannot be homotopy cocontinuous as if it were every $\oo$\nbd-category would be \good. \todo{Mettre ref interne de où il sera montré que le morphisme n'est pas cocontinu.} However, as for any morphism of op-prederivators \todo{ref}, for any diagram $d : I \to \oo\Cat$ \end{paragr}
 ... ... @@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ The nerve functor $N_{\omega} : \omega\Cat \to \Psh{\Delta}$ sends equivalences In particular, the previous lemma implies that the identity functor on $\oo\Cat$ induces a morphism of localizers $(\oo\Cat,\W^{\folk}) \to (\oo\Cat,\W^{\Th})$, which then induces a morphism of op-prederivators % \begin{equation}\label{cantoTh} $\Ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \to \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}). \mathcal{J} : \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\folk}) \to \Ho(\oo\Cat^{\Th}).$ %\end{equation} \iffalse Note that for every small category $A$, the functor ... ...
 ... ... @@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ \newcommand{\R}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{R}}} %Idem \newcommand{\T}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{T}}} %Idem \newcommand{\G}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{G}}} %Idem \newcommand{\J}{\ensuremath{\mathcal{J}}} %Idem %Small categories ... ... @@ -123,6 +124,8 @@ \newcommand{\pol}{\mathrm{pol}} %For polygraphic related stuff \newcommand{\good}{homologically coherent} %This is provisional. I need to find a good terminology % squelette \newcommand{\sk}{\mathrm{sk}} ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment