Commit 95c0b2ef by Leonard Guetta

### changed a tiny detail

parent 1896ebf4
 ... ... @@ -238,8 +238,7 @@ From the previous proposition, we deduce the following very useful corollary. L(C) \ar[r,"L(\gamma)"]& L(D) \end{tikzcd} \] is a \emph{homotopy} cocartesian square of $\Cat$ when equipped with the Thomason equivalences. is a Thomason \emph{homotopy} cocartesian square of $\Cat$. \end{corollary} \begin{proof} Since the nerve $N$ induces an equivalence of op-prederivators ... ... @@ -1629,7 +1628,7 @@ Now let $\sS_2$ be labelled as In particular, square \eqref{eq:squarebouquethybridvertical} is again a cocartesian square of identification of two objects of a free category, and thus, it is Thomason homotopy cocartesian. This implies that square \eqref{eq:squarebouquethybrid} is homotopy cocartesian. Since $\sS_0$, $\sD_1$ and $\sS_2$ are \good{} and since the morphisms $\langle C, D \rangle : \sS_0 \to \sS_2$ and $i_1 : \sS_0 \to \sD_1$ are folk cofibrations, this proves that $P$ is \good{} \eqref{eq:squarebouquethybrid} is Thomason homotopy cocartesian. Since $\sS_0$, $\sD_1$ and $\sS_2$ are \good{} and since the morphisms $\langle C, D \rangle : \sS_0 \to \sS_2$ and $i_1 : \sS_0 \to \sD_1$ are folk cofibrations, this proves that $P$ is \good{} and has the homotopy type of the bouquet of a $1$\nbd{}sphere with a $2$\nbd{}sphere. \end{paragr} ... ...
 ... ... @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ is a homotopy cocartesian square of simplicial sets. Since $N_{\oo}$ induces an \ar[from=1-1,to=2-2,phantom,"\ulcorner",very near end] \end{tikzcd} \] is homotopy cocartesian with respect to Thomason equivalences, then $C$ is \good{}. is Thomason homotopy cocartesian, then $C$ is \good{}. \end{proposition} \begin{proof} Since the morphisms $i_k$ are folk cofibration and the ... ...
No preview for this file type
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!